Frederick A. Kramer and Lynn Wolff bring us this article on Boston‘s Rose Kennedy Greenway project. Attendees at recent meetings have noted a need for food markets, cafes and public shelters. The writers argue that Boston’s Redevelopment Athority must make a bold move regarding density to make sure that this project is successful. Americans have a phobia of density, understandably based on the misuse of density by past government projects which has contributed to crime and urban decline. We need to get over that. Density isn’t inherently bad. Although there are issues with a lack of light and “canyonization,” we can mitigate these negative effects by better design. The writers advocate tall buildings, which, compared to what most Americans want, I would agree with, but as I’ve mentioned before, I agree with Christopher Alexander that buildings should rarely be above four stories. But we have seen, by the creative work of those such as Moule & Polyzoides, that you can have inovative density within this limit. The writers go on to say that a mix of transit options and uses, the fundamental elements of TOD, need to be included in the project. I think that this is a great project, and I’m glad to see smart people working to make sure that it works out.
- The end of this blog and the beginning of a new one
- TED Talks on Cities
- A Study on Regional Governments
- The City in History
- Want to Prevent Oil Spill Disasters? Stop Driving
- Will Tysons halfway plan bolster or doom the future city?
- How to save the Greenway? Make it a neighborhood
- American Makeover Episode 1 – SPRAWLANTA
- City Council approves cars on K Street
- New USDOT Report Identifies Win-Win Transportation Emission Reduction Strategies